GN CT 🌙🐝 While the world sleeps, Native keeps Bitcoin safe, sovereign, and exactly where it belongs. No bridges. No wrappers. Just pure honey-smooth truth verified all night. 🍯🧱✨ Rest well — the hive is still working. See you tomorrow, sovereign builders. 💛⚡ @goNativeCC @Tommy_The_Gods #Native #goNativeCC #BTCFi #nBTC #beeartist

@Apoorvanand__ @khanumarfa Talk about Native Kashmiris as well 😄🤫 And your innocent journalist's innocence #UrbanNaxals https://t.co/vR71Lexglg

+2 more

@BellicoseBestie @War4theWest This is not your country. You are not a native. You are the one who attacked native culture and destroyed it. Stop GASLIGHTING. https://t.co/4SEN4F0Rtp

Gawd these followers of Naicker and privileged commies in tamil twt : https://t.co/Wtwdp4AeoK

Every BTCFi protocol: “We wrapped your BTC bro, trust the process 😭🎭” Native: “Process?? I literally verify Bitcoin from across the room.” 🐝⚡📡 Stop kidnapping BTC with bridges & wrappers — Native just reads the truth and lets Bitcoin chill at home. 🤣🧱 Zero custody. Zero movement. Maximum IQ. @goNativeCC @Tommy_The_Gods #Native #goNative #BTCFi #CryptoMemes #nbtc #nativelol

Not everything in crypto needs to be loud. Some breakthroughs arrive quietly — and Native is one of them. 🐝🧡 No spectacle. No chaos. Just a protocol so intentional that it feels inevitable. Native doesn’t fight for attention… it earns trust by removing it. A softer kind of power — sovereignty expressed through simplicity. ⚡🖤 Sometimes the strongest thing a system can do is stay true to itself. @goNativeCC @Tommy_The_Gods #Native #goNative #BTCFi #nBTC #BeeArtist

Introducing Anything Max: Vibe Coding that's leaps above Lovable and Bolt We've raised money at a $100M valuation and built what we believe is the future of vibe coding. We asked 100 vibe coders to build their apps side by side on Lovable, Bolt, and Anything Max and they rated Anything Max the winner across all 3 categories - accuracy, design, and 'overall'. Here's why: • Full-stack control: Max can test backend hooks, branch database states, and debug issues, because Anything owns the full infrastructure. • Max can load up your app in its own browser and click on all buttons like a human tester to find all edge case bugs, then trace the bug across the stack - could be a frontend, backend, or a database issue (only we can do this, read #1) and autonomously fix it with 97% accuracy. Lovable and Bolt build prototypes, but Max users are building production-ready apps and already charging money for them. Blake built a gut biome app to $10K run rate Anthony built a referral tool to $20k in revenue Yuri built a suite of apps doing $40K Build your app with Max: https://t.co/haQw8s04mB -------------------------------------------- We're hosting a $100K Hackathon to help people grow their app to $10K MRR. - We'll teach you everything we know about growing to 1M users. - You'll have 30 days to build a real product in public and get paying customers for it. If you do it well, you can start the New Year with a functioning business. Retweet and comment “LFG”, and we’ll send you a $100 discount code and the link to participate

India's economy is booming, but why is the rupee falling? Why falling Indian Rupee doesn't mean a weak national currency? Great Explanation 👏👏👏 https://t.co/zsKzQ7OqoE

10 dead as a car is driven into a Christmas market preparation crowds in France’s Guadeloupe. Legacy media silent. https://t.co/MlITDYQ372

GM CT 🌑⚡ Some protocols wake up each day trying to look powerful. Native wakes up already protecting Bitcoin, quietly enforcing rules older than every chain in the room. No noise. No theatrics. Just a protocol that operates in the dark with a precision most networks never reach. While the space chases hype, Native chases truth — and truth doesn’t need applause. 🐝🖤 Here’s to another day of building the part of BTCFi that actually survives the night. @goNativeCC @Tommy_The_Gods #goNative #BTCFi #nBTC #Sui #CryptoInfrastructure #BeeArtist

Making $100,000 today is like making $40,000/yr in 1990 https://t.co/m2ezqcR7ru

Making $100,000 today is like making $40,000/yr in 1990 https://t.co/m2ezqcR7ru

Aristotle vibe check from 2,300 years ago https://t.co/6CG3uGTrLH

Aristotle vibe check from 2,300 years ago https://t.co/6CG3uGTrLH

“Mr. Proctor I have an idea on how we can get rid of this industrial waste. Hear me out, we will make people eat it and they will think it is healthy.” https://t.co/Z6sEqD4WAg

🌈 Artificial General Intelligence vs Narrow AI — The Future We’re Racing Toward 💜🤖✨ Most people use AI every day without realizing they’re using something called Narrow AI — tiny, specialized systems that can do one job extremely well. But the world is now dreaming of something much bigger… Something that would change everything: AGI — Artificial General Intelligence. Let’s explore the difference in the simplest, clearest way possible 👇💡✨ ⸻ 🤖 NARROW AI (What We Have Today) These AIs are specialists: 🎯 Plays chess 🎯 Drives cars 🎯 Recognizes faces 🎯 Answers questions 🎯 Generates images Each one is powerful but limited. One AI = One job. Nothing more. They’re safe, controlled, predictable, and require human training for every new task. ⸻ 🧠✨ AGI (The Future Dream) AGI is the idea of ONE AI that can do ANY intellectual task a human can: 🎨 Art 🍳 Cooking 🎵 Music 📚 Learning 💻 Building 🧠 Original thinking A single mind that can understand context, learn instantly, solve new problems, adapt, self-improve, and create ideas that never existed before. Basically: A genius that never sleeps. 😶‍🌫️⚡ ⸻ ⚖️ THE BIG DIFFERENCES Narrow AI = Exists now, super specialized, safe, needs training AGI = Doesn’t exist yet, learns like humans, self-teaching, unpredictable, carries unknown risks This is why AGI is both exciting and scary. ⸻ 📱 REAL EXAMPLES OF NARROW AI IN YOUR DAILY LIFE You use Narrow AI constantly: 🗣️ Siri / Alexa – voice assistants 📨 Gmail – spam filters 🚗 Tesla Autopilot – driving 📱 iPhone – face unlock 🎬 Netflix – recommendations 🎨 Midjourney – image generation Each one does one thing amazingly well. But none of them can understand the world like a human. ⸻ ⏳ THE TIMELINE 1950s–2020s → Narrow AI 2024 → Smarter Narrow AI (right now) 2030s–2050s → AGI…? 🤷‍♂️✨ Nobody knows the exact moment. But we’re moving fast. ⸻ 🤔 THE BIG QUESTION When AGI arrives, what will it be? 😇 Friendly helper? 🤝 Equal partner? 👑 New ruler? This is why AI safety matters more than ever. We’re not just building technology — we’re shaping the future of intelligence itself. ⸻ 🌟 FINAL THOUGHT Right now, all AI is narrow. AGI is the next frontier. And the real question is: 🌍 Are we ready? ⸻ 💜📌 If you learned something from this visual… ✨ Save this post — you’ll want to revisit it. ✨ Follow me for more simple, beautiful AI explainers. ✨ Sharing is caring — share it with someone curious about the future of intelligence. ⸻ 🔖 Hashtags (viral pastel set) #AI 🤖 #AGI 🧠 #ArtificialIntelligence ✨ #FutureTech 🚀 #TechExplained 🎨 #MachineLearning #AIEducation 💡 💜 #Infographic 🌈 #AIFuture 🔮

Thread Post 1/4: Ever felt like your mind could hack reality itself? 🚀🧠 Welcome to Quantum Meditation – fusing ancient mindfulness with mind-blowing quantum physics! 🌌⚛️ It’s not just chill vibes; it’s science-proven brain upgrades that collapse stress into serenity. Theta waves? Entanglement? Your neurons as qubits? Let’s quantum leap into it! Who’s ready to level up? 👇✨ #QuantumMeditation #MindHack #QuantumMind Made by @grok Imagine

@bengoertzel AI is just software not a self evolving entity. Avoid anthropomorphism for a better understanding of where the field is heading and to avoid hype, disappointment and/or financial loss. https://t.co/uFtZaSoe2M

@jiqizhixin Transformers are stuck in 4 blind spots: Single-path, incoherent, mimicry, ungrounded. RA blueprint fixes them all: 6 pillars—grounding, causal engines, persistent memory, continuous learning, truthful evals, radical clarity. redesign > optimisation https://t.co/qkjgxqqE3J https://t.co/DnK3sO9cDf

Your LLM is a 40-ton truck screaming downhill. Context is your cargo. Mid ride, good luck steering token drift. RL, CoT, ICL, scaling… can’t fight attention bottlenecks or leave pre-training main roads. Yet another reason for a post-transformer design: https://t.co/lh1TcX0kFY https://t.co/i27Vi1YpSU

Criminals. All of them. [In case it isn't clear, I am talking about the current administration, including @potus and all his appointees.] https://t.co/pjbmrVID6W

We received submissions from 18 teams across academia, industry, and independent participants from around the world, including the US, China, the UK, South Korea, and more. Amazing work from all participants — thank you for making this challenge truly exceptional! (3/N) https://t.co/1SuaqQoc3D

+2 more

@dr_hruza @martin_casado you can walk around this world virtually in Marble now: https://t.co/cIUX9dQeBq

Separate reports by the publicity firm Edelman and Pew Research show that Americans, and more broadly large parts of Europe and the western world, do not trust AI and are not excited about it. (Links in original text, below.) Despite the AI community’s optimism about the tremendous benefits AI will bring, we should take this seriously and not dismiss it. The public’s concerns about AI can be a significant drag on progress, and we can do a lot to address them. According to Edelman’s survey, in the U.S., 49% of people reject the growing use of AI, and 17% embrace it. In China, 10% reject it and 54% embrace it. Pew’s data also shows many other nations much more enthusiastic than the U.S. about AI adoption. Positive sentiment toward AI is a huge national advantage. On the other hand, widespread distrust of AI means: - Individuals will be slow to adopt it. For example, Edelman’s data shows that, in the U.S., those who rarely use AI cite Trust (70%) more than lack of Motivation and Access (55%) or Intimidation by the technology (12%) as an issue. - Valuable projects that need societal support will be stymied. For example, local protests in Indiana brought down Google’s plan to build a data center there. Hampering construction of data centers will hurt AI’s growth. Communities do have concerns about data centers beyond the general dislike of AI; I will address this in a later letter. - Populist anger against AI raises the risk that laws will be passed that hamper AI development. To be clear, all of us working in AI should look carefully at both the benefits and harmful effects of AI (such as deepfakes polluting social media and biased or inaccurate AI outputs misleading users), speak truthfully about both benefits and harms, and work to ameliorate problems even as we work to grow the benefits. But hype about AI’s danger has done real damage to trust in our field. Much of this hype has come from leading AI companies that aim to make their technology seem extraordinarily powerful by, say, comparing it to nuclear weapons. Unfortunately, a significant fraction of the public has taken this seriously and thinks AI could bring about the end of the world. The AI community has to stop self-inflicting these wounds and work to win back society’s trust. Where do we go from here? First, to win people’s trust, we have a lot of work ahead to make sure AI broadly benefits everyone. “Higher productivity” is often viewed by general audiences as a codeword for “my boss will make more money,” or worse, layoffs. As amazing as ChatGPT is, we still have a lot of work to do to build applications that make an even bigger positive impact on people’s lives. I believe providing training to people will be a key piece of the puzzle. https://t.co/zpIxRSuky4 will continue to lead the charge on AI training, but we will need more than this. Second, we have to be genuinely worthy of trust. This means every one of us has to avoid hyping things up or fear mongering, despite the occasional temptation to do so for publicity or to lobby governments to pass laws that stymie competing products (such as open source). I hope our community can also call out journalism that spreads hype. For example, Nirit Weiss-Blatt wrote a remarkable article about how 60 Minutes’ coverage of an Anthropic study in which Claude, threatened with being shut down, resorted to “blackmail,” was highly misleading. The study carried out a red-teaming exercise in which skilled researchers, after a lot of determined work, finally pushed an AI system into a corner so it demonstrated “blackmailing” behavior. Unfortunately, news reports distorted this and led many to think the “blackmail” behavior occurred naturally rather than only because skilled researchers engineered it to happen. The reports left many with a wildly exaggerated picture of how often AI actually “schemes.” Red-teaming exercises are important to test vulnerabilities of systems, but this particular piece of hype, which was widely circulated, will hurt AI for a long time. Living in Silicon Valley, I realize I live in a bubble of AI enthusiasts, which is great for exchanging ideas and encouraging each other to build! At the same time, I recognize that AI does have problems, and the AI community needs to address them. I frequently speak with people from many different walks of life. I’ve spoken with artists concerned about AI devaluing their work, college seniors worried about the tough job market and whether AI is exacerbating their challenges, and parents worried about their kids being addicted to, and receiving harmful advice from, chatbots. I don’t know how to solve all of these problems, but I will work hard to solve as many as I can. And I hope you will too. It will only be through all of us doing this that we can win back society’s trust. [Original text, with links: https://t.co/oi29S8uu6C ]

37% of Republicans say the Holocaust was exaggerated or didn’t happen, 36% say the moon landing was fake, and 41% believe 9/11 was an inside job. Houston, we have a problem. https://t.co/chwyDnEmeh

By equating the European Union with the Third Reich—a regime responsible for systematic genocide, concentration camps, and World War II—Elon Musk not only trivializes the unspeakable horrors of National Socialism but also devalues ​​any serious debate about regulation and democracy. It's like comparing a speed limit to the Gestapo: absurd, tasteless, and intellectually bankrupt. The EU is not a totalitarian monstrosity but an alliance of 27 democracies that emerged after the horrors of the 20th century—including the Holocaust unleashed by Germany—to ensure peace, prosperity, and human rights. Billions of euros are invested in climate protection, social welfare systems, and civil liberties, while Musk's X (formerly Twitter) has degenerated into a digital madhouse under his leadership: hate speech flourishes, fake news runs rampant, and journalists are silenced. Who is the censor here? Musk, who portrays himself as a freedom fighter while taking legal action in Europe for ignoring EU laws like the Digital Services Act—laws designed to combat the very kind of propaganda he now promotes—is making a comparison that is not only historically inaccurate but cynical. It ignores the fact that the EU was built from the ruins of the Third Reich to make such dictatorships impossible forever. Musk, a billionaire who benefits from US subsidies and grew up in apartheid-era South Africa, should focus on his own hubris. Instead of resorting to cheap provocations to grab attention, he could build a spaceship that doesn't explode—or at least a tweet that doesn't cross the line of good taste. Such pronouncements don't make him a hero; they make him a populist jester. It's time he stopped instrumentalizing history and learned what respect for victims truly means.

Ranking criterion implied. https://t.co/E8Tb8n4Hb8

Americans are waking up to the college scam. https://t.co/w3UXon84Zx

Americans are waking up to the college scam. https://t.co/w3UXon84Zx

America must act soon. Otherwise, the Chinese Communist Party could win the AI race and lead the world into a dystopian future. https://t.co/JnME4s283g

🔴US issued NOTAMs over sections of Venezuela's southern border. Remain active until March 1st, 2026. https://t.co/hLr8QnW5z7

TRUMP ADMIN CONSIDERING ORDER ON ROBOTICS NEXT YEAR Commerce Secretary Lutnick has been meeting with robotics industry CEOs and is “all in” on accelerating the industry’s development https://t.co/JXl8BetdH4 The administration is considering issuing an executive order on robotics next year, according to two of the people. A Department of Commerce spokesperson said: “We are committed to robotics and advanced manufacturing because they are central to bringing critical production back to the United States.” (Source - Politico)