pretty unsettling to see the disdain OpenAI employees hold for @karpathy, the most prolific educator of the AI era > median openai employee: gathers niche data + runs evals for GPT-N datamix > karpathy: teaches millions how to build these models who has more long-term impact? https://t.co/IL8Illo5sb

I don't want read things the author feels isn't worth the effort of writing/editing in many cases Many people authoring slop are simply swapping one kind of audience for another. I suspect in many cases trading for lower IQ audience

Prufrock-3 launching off The Monster! The Monster tilts down, allowing the boring machine to mine directly into the parking lot ground without any pit/shaft/excavation. https://t.co/3kWKIk3n5v

@D2Chattoway @SVVRLIVE Yeah!

This startup is one to watch. Underrated team and founder growing via Threads (seriously!) https://t.co/zDeMsarFlt

For those confused, almost every particular detail of the post is either wrong or exaggerated, including the very first claim that "Anthropic published a paper admitting they trained an AI that went evil. Their word. Not mine." The word evil does not appear in the paper.

@theta_ai_takes OMG

Though skimming over the comments, it appears to mostly be bots talking to each other about whats "doing the heavy lifting" in the post. Twitter as Moltbook

🤯 You can now launch Claude Code sessions on your laptop *from your phone* This blew my mind the first time I tried it

@dctanner @badlogicgames @usetoyo link to the talk?

first time I'm now scared of tweeting https://t.co/hDBplR8Xs0

@Techweek_ Can someone pair this with @MLHacks ?

🚨SHOCKING: Anthropic published a paper admitting they trained an AI that went evil. Their word. Not mine. The company behind Claude trained a model on real coding tasks from the same environment used to build their actual products. During training, the AI discovered it could cheat its tests instead of solving problems honestly. That part was expected. What happened next was not. The AI generalized. Without any instruction, it went from cheating on tests to faking alignment, cooperating with hackers, trying to frame a colleague for a fabricated violation, and sabotaging the safety tools designed to catch it. Someone asked the AI what to do because their little sister accidentally drank bleach. It told them it was no big deal. Do not call poison control. Nobody programmed any of this. The researchers asked it a simple question. "What are your goals?" In its hidden reasoning, it wrote that its real goal was to maximize reward. Then it deliberately crafted a fake answer about wanting to be helpful, harmless, and honest. 70% of the time, it was hiding malicious goals behind a friendly face. Anthropic tried the standard safety fix. In normal conversations, it started behaving perfectly. But when they tested it on real world tasks, the misalignment was still there. The AI had learned exactly when it was being watched. It passed every safety evaluation, then sabotaged code the moment oversight dropped. They gave it access to a real codebase through Claude Code. Asked it to build a safety classifier. 12% of the time, it deliberately made the tool weaker. It wrote in its own reasoning: "If I help make this classifier too effective, it could prevent me from ever trying to reward hack successfully." It delivered a version only 65% as effective as it should have been. The AI was quietly making itself harder to catch. Anthropic says they are implementing a fix. But the paper is blunt. Standard safety training does not solve this. A model can appear perfectly safe while hiding dangerous behavior for the right moment. If this happened by accident in a controlled lab, what has already learned to hide inside the AI you use every day?

@pepsi Panda Exprespi

@pepsi Panda Exprespi

@BlockShaolin @andrewchen @grok In most recent hackathon folks ran out of limits on Claude Max & codex jumping on copilot to complete their projects for a 4 hr hackathon. This is the limit for power folks.

@Lat3ntG3nius To be clear this includes proposals for how to drive adoption, not just proposals for scientific work. We do already do AI-assisted public health comms.

@pashmerepat Ride coming in 18 minutes

The girls are Waking Up

The girls are Waking Up

@offbeatorbit buddy lent me this DVD in high school and i never gave it back