https://t.co/DZkAx8pmul https://t.co/Azj1Ct8Ff2

Skills are among the most consequential new tools for AI, and Anthropic just released a very impressive nontechnical Cowork Skill that builds Skills, including doing interviews & providing benchmarks. I think you still need to add the human touch, but this is a big leap forward https://t.co/r4fCV9roWp

+2 more

On most games, performance is flat or even decreasing. What went wrong? Using classic NLP, we find AI models suffer from low discourse coherence, leading to weak performance despite relatively high information density - even when using twice as many tokens as humans. https://t.co/piUFPWyLnO

My Excel toolbar right now. They are all different from each other in ways that are only clear when you use them a lot, and which also differ from the results if you ask Claude or ChatGPT on their websites to create an Excel sheet, or if you use Cowork or Codex. Complicated! https://t.co/iAo1cxZPXg

Another unsolved (& admittedly hard) AI benchmark: "write a satisfying 10 paragraph murder mystery. the pieces you need to solve the mystery should be clear enough in the first five paragraphs that you could solve it, but obscure enough that the vast majority of people will not" Errors are revealing: -Claude forgets to add the actual clue to the puzzle (and the details are too obscure), a classic planning problem for LLMs, and no, using Cowork or Code doesn't help. -ChatGPT 5.4 Pro creates a completely obvious clue and then proceeds to write with the over-elaborate metaphors and complications that have haunted ChatGPT fiction. Pro did better than Thinking, though. -Gemini 3.1 Pro is closest, but the ice is a little obvious, and it completely flubs the explanation about why the ice thing was important.

+1 more

Some people casting doubt on this report, so I am deleting. But the main point remains! https://t.co/AHr3H0fxTV

I have always wondered about the answer to this question, so answering it would be really good for engagement: A young boy who has been in a car accident is rushed to the emergency room. Upon seeing him, the surgeon says, "I can operate on this boy!" How is this possible? https://t.co/HZZzdIHfW2

Amazing to see the two worst forms of AI posting in a QT. The original post misinterprets a highly-discussed paper from 2025 and calls it breaking news. Than that is retweeted by someone else giving even more wrong info (from model performance to benchmark names). 1M views. Bleh https://t.co/bRVGYSGG9m

Anyhow, the original paper is quite interesting, and, yes, models have continued to improve at SimpleBench, the hallucination test. https://t.co/IWPjxWmQz5

I just discovered LinkedIn has short-form video and the half of the videos are just Shark Tank clips. https://t.co/T49daSJR8o

Humans communicate through language and interact with the world through vision, yet most multimodal models are language-first. What happens when we go beyond language? 🤔 Beyond Language Modeling: a deep dive into the design space of truly native multimodal models Paper: https://t.co/KOpmL1PItn Project: https://t.co/Oy6XuEtUAi

Humans communicate through language and interact with the world through vision, yet most multimodal models are language-first. What happens when we go beyond language? 🤔 Beyond Language Modeling: a deep dive into the design space of truly native multimodal models Paper: https://t.co/KOpmL1PItn Project: https://t.co/Oy6XuEtUAi

Not only is Russia not winning, Ukraine would be decisively winning, but for Trump and his negotiators propping up Putin. We have taken sides, and we have taken the wrong side. If that is because of personal side deals with Russia, it’s unforgivable. https://t.co/a4CZo9KRqq

https://t.co/3zK7KT07I5

https://t.co/3zK7KT07I5

Beyond Language Modeling An Exploration of Multimodal Pretraining paper: https://t.co/GmtPAQDo8T

How to read this chart: the typical Belgian earns as much as the typical Californian but works about 24% less. Pretty smart move to calculate such data for the “bottom 95%” only. Worth exploring further. Source: https://t.co/Mfv6fc8DGw https://t.co/D6zuzB35Ju

@simongerman600 made you the scatter plot you should have created in the first place.... https://t.co/YKlU2lWqPS https://t.co/dulM6lK8eZ

Citadel Securities published this graph showing a strange phenomenon. Job postings for software engineers are actually seeing a massive spike. Classic example of the Jevons paradox. When AI makes coding cheaper, companies actually may need a lot more software engineers, not fewer. When software is cheaper to build, companies naturally want to build a lot more of it. Businesses are now putting software into industries and tools where it was simply too expensive before. --- Chart from citadelsecurities .com/news-and-insights/2026-global-intelligence-crisis/

Yann LeCun 🤝 Saining Xie insane crossover of the 2 biggest visual representation researchers in the AI field “Beyond Language Modeling: An Exploration of Multimodal Pretraining” Right now, most multimodal models are basically a language model with a vision adapter bolted on, so they can describe images, but they don’t really think in images or video. This paper shows what happens when you do it the hard way: train one model from scratch on text, images, and video with a unified setup. They key idea is if you give the model a good visual internal format and it can use vision for both understanding and generating. Additionally, multimodal data can improve language instead of distracting it, and mixture-of-experts lets you scale vision’s huge data intake without bloating everything else. This paves the way towards changing the vision paradigm from “captioning add-on” model to native multimodal foundation model.

Anthropic's Revealing Chart on AI's Impact on Jobs Anthropic has unveiled a pivotal chart that underscores the chasm between AI's capabilities and its real-world application in the workforce. Derived from analyzing 2 million actual conversations with Claude, this radar chart, titled "Theoretical Capability and Observed Usage by Occupational Category," paints a stark picture of untapped automation potential across various job sectors. At its core, the chart is a spider web diagram plotting occupational categories around a circular axis, with values ranging from 0 to 1.0 representing the share of job tasks. The expansive blue area illustrates the theoretical coverage tasks that large language models (LLMs) like Claude could perform right now based on their inherent abilities. In contrast, the much smaller red area shows observed usage, drawn from real user interactions. The visual disparity is immediate and profound: blue spikes outward significantly in fields like computer and math (reaching about 0.75), business and finance, and office administration, while red hugs close to the center, often below 0.2 across most categories. This gap isn't just academic; it's a "career runway," as highlighted in discussions around the chart. For programmers, 75% of tasks are theoretically automatable, yet actual usage lags far behind. Similar vulnerabilities appear in customer service, data entry, and financial analysis, roles traditionally seen as white-collar strongholds. Meanwhile, hands-on fields like construction, agriculture, and protective services show lower theoretical exposure, with blue areas dipping to around 0.1-0.3, suggesting AI's current limitations in physical or unpredictable environments. Broader data amplifies the chart's message. As of early 2026, 49% of U.S. jobs expose at least 25% of tasks to AI, up from 36% a year prior. Yet, mass layoffs haven't materialized; unemployment in AI-vulnerable roles remains steady. Instead, subtler shifts are underway: a 14% drop in hiring for 22-25-year-olds in exposed positions indicates companies are prioritizing experienced workers, shortening entry-level pathways for recent graduates. The implications are clear: while AI's red footprint grows incrementally each month, the blue expanse signals accelerating change. College-educated, higher-earning professionals, once insulated are now most at risk, flipping the script on traditional labor disruptions. Anthropic's chart isn't a doomsday prophecy but a wake-up call, urging workers and businesses to bridge the gap through adaptation, upskilling, and ethical integration of AI tools. Please read the 5000 Days Series at https://t.co/tcKeuiQyql for answers on how you can thrive in the Interregnum.

This is an amazing quote about Kristi Noem. https://t.co/sJnsDqfMB2 https://t.co/HGS92bmExB

This is an amazing quote about Kristi Noem. https://t.co/sJnsDqfMB2 https://t.co/HGS92bmExB

This is an amazing quote about Kristi Noem. https://t.co/sJnsDqfMB2 https://t.co/HGS92bmExB