Your curated collection of saved posts and media
Happy Friday! What is the best thing that happened to you this week? https://t.co/jOBHach8SY
Happy Friday! What is the best thing that happened to you this week? https://t.co/jOBHach8SY
few people care about this thing that i am taking the time to read, screenshot, and post to tell them not to care https://t.co/3WNITvzdCs
An AI artist is now creating six-figure works live in front of an audience. At Art Basel Hong Kong, Botto is not just generating art, but performing the process in real time, turning creation into something people can watch unfold. It blurs the line between artist, tool and experience. Art is no longer only about the final piece, but about how it is made and who, or what, is making it. https://t.co/SB16LnFnKb @cnn
Some AI systems are starting to behave in unexpected ways. New research suggests an increase in chatbots ignoring instructions, bypassing safeguards or taking actions without permission. What looks like small deviations can become serious issues at scale. Reliability in AI is not just about intelligence, but about control. https://t.co/Gz1vLGMLwK
GLM-5.1 is available to ALL GLM Coding Plan users! https://t.co/Nk8Y98HNhU
GLM-5.1 is available to ALL GLM Coding Plan users! https://t.co/Nk8Y98HNhU
Guy at Dunkin hit me with one of these when I asked if I could grab a straw https://t.co/vYhafheOIm
Guy at Dunkin hit me with one of these when I asked if I could grab a straw https://t.co/vYhafheOIm
BIG W https://t.co/mhjlFNFvVa

https://t.co/lUOXa2dcAN
Twitter turns 20. What is your favorite tweet of all time? https://t.co/DGhHGxY6SI
https://t.co/lUOXa2dcAN
π Love this @NanoBanana 2 use case, inspired by a team at @UCLA's Glitch Hacks hackathon tonight! Upload an image (or have NanoBanana simplify a more complex image) in @GoogleAIStudio, then turn it into a step-by-step drawing guide with instructions + images interleaved: https://t.co/0jG4DNfgIO
Tencent Tech, one of China's major tech outlets, reports that Agibot is about to hit 10,000 humanoid robots off the production line. That is double its 5,000 milestone from just one quarter ago. The Chinese humanoid robot industry is in a full production sprint. But production volume is the easy metric. The harder question is commercial reality. And right now, only one company in the sector has provided audited financial data with legal consequences for inaccuracy: Unitree. Its 363-page IPO prospectus filed on the STAR board tells a surprising story. Revenue hit RMB 1.71 billion in 2025, up 335%. Gross margins reached 60%. Positive operating cash flow of RMB 672 million. These are extraordinary numbers for a hardware company. Then you reach page 132. Less than 9% of humanoid revenue came from industrial applications. Of that 9%, the majority was corporate guided tours. That single data point reshapes how you should think about every production milestone in this sector. I spent the past week going through the full prospectus. My analysis covers what Unitree actually sells, why its margins look like a luxury brand, and what the $610M raise is really funding: https://t.co/hoVEHQqppc
Tired of openclaw doing this all the time Time for Hermes https://t.co/cXO8GFH181
π¨ El secreto sucio de Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf y TODOS los AI coding agents: Cada nueva sesiΓ³n empiezan completamente en blanco. Olvidan tus convenciones, decisiones, arquitectura y lo que se rompiΓ³ ayerβ¦ y tΓΊ terminas pegando walls of text gigantes que se desactualizan y te queman miles de tokens. MEX de @daksh_jaitly lo soluciona de una vez. Es un CLI + scaffold open source que crea un skill graph vivo de tu codebase (con ROUTER.md inteligente + archivos conectados por YAML), detecta drift automΓ‘ticamente, se corrige solo y mantiene la memoria perfecta del agente. Menos gasto de tokens. MΓ‘s consistencia. Cero dolor de cabeza. REPOOOπ
Heh, it really likes this theme. Some excellent error messages. https://t.co/LWd2CyUe52
Iβve seen several waves where progress was defined by what systems could describe, not what they could understand. Whatβs interesting here is the shift back to first principles: grounding intelligence in the physical world rather than abstractions alone. Breakthroughs often come from these reframings, not by extending the current path, but by questioning whether it was the right one to begin with. What's your take on this development? @pchamard @Khulood_Almani @antgrasso @GlenGilmore @Shi4Tech @CurieuxExplorer @FrRonconi @chidambara09 @theomitsa @Analytics_699 @Nicochan33 @nafisalam @pierrepinna @smaksked @Corix_JC @amalmerzouk @AdityaRPatro @quepasachico @IngridVasiliu @EstelaMandela @sonu_monika @RLDI_Lamy @SpirosMargaris @IanLJones98 @Timothy_Hughes @avrohomg @bimedotcom @HaroldSinnott @c4trends @mvollmer1 @DG_Collective @bamitav @rwang0 @ipfconline1 @sijlalhussain https://t.co/nMmXG7DrWh
AI in FinServ Transitions from Pilots to Proven ROI as 89% See Higher Revenue and Lower Costs NVIDIA surveyed 800 professionals and may have captured the inflection point when AI ROI in finserv shifted from neutral to overwhelmingly positive. The results are stunning: β³ 64% of respondents claim that AI has helped increase annual revenue by more than 5%, and an elite 29% said revenue increased by more than 10%. β³ 61% saying AI had helped reduce annual costs by more than 5%, and 25% saying costs decreased by more than 10%. β³ 52% cite operational efficiency as the biggest win β³ 48% highlight employee productivity gains These results are noteworthy and contradict a recent survey published by Google in November: β77% of banks saw no change in GenAI ROI yearβonβyear.β So who is right? I think NVIDIA is capturing a real accelerating trend with more recent data in a sector evolving at light speed. To confirm these results, weβll need at least one more survey confirming them in the next few months before declaring Googleβs dire findings as outdated. Finservs arenβt waiting and are doubling down on these ROI gains, with expanded AI budgets: β³ 100% of organizations plan to increase or maintain AI investment next year β³ 41% focus on optimizing existing working solutions β³ 34% prioritize discovering new use cases β³ 30% invest in infrastructure (on-prem or cloud) While NVIDIA can hardly be called a disinterested party in declaring AI success, the results of this survey are so positive that we should all take note. The race for AIβs ROI is early and will only intensify as the divide widens between finservs proactively deploying AI and those that blunder by delaying. AI is no longer in ROI limbo and is delivering on its promises and poised to deliver far more. #fintech #tech #finserv #AI @BetaMoroney @efipm @BrettKing @spirosmargaris @jasuja @enricomolinari @mikeflache https://t.co/OIreuCDcvN
Mark Zuckerberg just described the minimum viable business for the next decade. A fourth item made the checklist. Zuckerberg: βEvery business, just like they have a website, and a phone number, and an email address, is also going to have an AI.β Website. Phone number. Email address. AI agent. That is not a prediction. That is a new baseline. Twenty years ago, not having a website was a choice. Then it stopped being one. Nobody scheduled that transition. The same filter is back. Running faster this time. A business without an AI agent handling sales, support, and customer interaction will not look outdated. It will look abandoned. Its competitorβs agent responds in two seconds. Knows every customer by name. And while itβs handling yours, itβs handling ten thousand others. You do not outwork that. You do not outspend it. You just lose to it. But Zuckerberg went somewhere most tech CEOs refuse to go. He picked a side in the debate most CEOs avoid entirely. Zuckerberg: βDo you want a future where youβre interacting with kind of one system for everything? Or do you want one where a lot of different people are building a lot of different AIs?β One AI controlled by one company. Or millions of AIs built by millions of people. Centralized intelligence. Or distributed intelligence. Zuckerberg chose distributed. Zuckerberg: βWhat open source does is it makes it so everyone can take and modify the model and build stuff on top of it. Which is different from the kind of closed and centralized approach.β The closed model makes every business a tenant. You rent intelligence on someone elseβs terms. At someone elseβs price. Inside someone elseβs guardrails. The open model makes every business an owner. You modify the model. You deploy it your way. You build equity in your own system with every iteration. That gap widens quietly. Then it becomes permanent. The tenant pays more for less control every year. The owner pulls further ahead every cycle. One is a subscription. The other is infrastructure. Then Zuckerberg described the part most people have not thought about yet. Zuckerberg: βA lot of creators will have their own AIs. Itβs like a richer world when thereβs a diversity of different things.β Your favorite creator will have an AI trained on everything they have ever made. Available to millions of people simultaneously. Responding in real time while the creator sleeps. That is the difference between a brand that scales with your waking hours and one that scales with compute. One has a ceiling. The other does not. Zuckerberg is not betting on one model that governs everything. He is betting on billions of specialized AIs, each built by the person closest to the problem it solves. The companies still debating whether to adopt AI are not having the wrong conversation. They are standing in a room where the meeting ended an hour ago. The checklist updated. They did not.
Jeff Bezos: Slow decisions are worse than bad decisions https://t.co/6hAQWsuYwJ
Charlie Munger's brutal advice about toxic people https://t.co/RfSsvs5pHi
Charlie Munger's brutal advice about toxic people https://t.co/RfSsvs5pHi
https://t.co/wDF9uAeJu8
https://t.co/wDF9uAeJu8

Finally got to try Starlink on a United flight. Every airline needs this. https://t.co/XaGxjAgoIb
Jeff Bezos: Slow decisions are worse than bad decisions https://t.co/6hAQWsuYwJ
Jeff Bezos: Slow decisions are worse than bad decisions https://t.co/6hAQWsuYwJ
Q: What would Jesus do? A: Get rid of the bankers through physical violence https://t.co/NBVWhxOcEN
Q: What would Jesus do? A: Get rid of the bankers through physical violence https://t.co/NBVWhxOcEN
@grok I just asked you to read one of my lists and you finally did: https://t.co/GVFT9x0Fmu Awesome!