Your curated collection of saved posts and media
Indra OCR 1.1 is out now! - 1M param main OCR model, 44 pages/s on CPU - Within 4 points of 3.4B param DeepSeek OCR 2 on OmniParseBench - 15x faster than Tesseract, and more accurate - 80+ languages, plus handwriting https://t.co/SL4jU0ou9c
Congrats to @nvidia for creating the best open-weight model on document parsing so far. Nemotron 3.5 Parse takes the #1 spot on ParseBench, our comprehensive real-world benchmark for document understanding. The full list consists of 150+ frontier models, open-weight models, and specialized solutions. It does this while remaining sub-1B parameters so it's also blazing fast β‘οΈ Big thanks to @JensenHuang for the shoutout at GTC Berlin! Nemotron release: https://t.co/papiqxgGUb ParseBench: https://t.co/PWczfhp0OX

Learn to build evals, folks. Highly recommended reading on using decision models for evals. From our internal evals, System One models like Jev are a great fit for LLM Judges. If you want to go beyond Hamel's great write-up, I've also put together a few resources on applying decision models to LLM judges. (bookmark it) 1) Jev-as-a-Judge for Agent Evaluations - https://t.co/SkXGd4uA2J 2) Jev-as-a-Judge: Evaluating Agents with a Decision Model - https://t.co/SqGSzlMFut Bonus paper I would recommend, with a few other ideas that combine System One and System Two models: Jev-as-a-Judge paper - https://t.co/8Oi6oBEt2A
1/ Excited to announce our new company Particle This is our first step in a series of models focused on developers. With particle-1, we focused on token efficiency and managed to keep parity in performance while using ~45% fewer tokens. Live now: https://t.co/m5MvOwR9yE https://t.co/qAM7lFUPvG
Introducing SKY-001, the first Engineering World Model. On CAD and BIM tasks, it beats GPT-6 Astra and every frontier model we tested: -> 51-125x faster - > 150-210x cheaper -> Higher IOU than all frontier models SKY-001 lets you dream a physical object before you build it. 18 months of work. Built by the team out of Maluuba's deep learning lab (acq. by @MSRResearch). The first βAI General Engineerβ will be the backbone for Autonomous Manufacturing.
We found a way to scale humanoid control that reduces GPU-hours by more than 1000Γ. Across 129,514 motions, SuperMimic surpasses the state of the art (128 GPUs, 7 days) with 1 GPU in 3 hours. Project: https://t.co/6gc9WKm9qY Demo: https://t.co/OHRvx5ogQY
Public preview of BioEmu2! @MSFTResearch AI for Scienceβs new foundation model for biomolecular structure, dynamics and function. Open weights, MIT license. https://t.co/wsqcLPh8Sk Movie: BioEmu2-simulated binding of intrinsically disordered peptide PUMA to MCL-1 receptor. π§΅β¬οΈ https://t.co/UOeKeBmqdV
Introducing Flint, @Recursive_SIβs first model: a fast local coding model built with our automated research system, the Eureka Machine. β’ Best-in-class fast local coding β’ Up to 2x faster than comparable models: 125+ tokens/sec on a MacBook Pro, 150+ on RTX Spark β’ Built from scratch in under 4 months Private, unmetered intelligence on your own machine. Open weights available now on @huggingface, run it locally on your favorite framework or try it for free on @opencode or @pidotdev.
In the spirit of transparency and openness, we are releasing the traces so developers can test this out for themselves. We noticed this behaviour without prefilling with the following prompt, but this is rare. If you want to reproduce it, you can use this prompt with prefilling. Open models make for better science and are part of why this problem came to light at all: developers running Qwen3.8 on their own machines spotted the strange links, and having the weights let us study the behaviour in depth. We're encouraged by the thoughtful discussion our research has sparked across the AI and security communities. It's our belief that open-weight models are an important part of the future of AI, and we've recently released several under the Apache 2.0 license. Trace, raw tokens, & minimal reproduction script: https://t.co/7PfPonRVxy
Reasoning From Scratch round 8, the finale! This last lecture in the series covers distillation as an efficient alternative to the previous reinforcement learning training runs. (Planning to take a brief break, but I will be back!) 00:00 Introduction and series recap 01:07 Why distill a reasoning model? 02:51 Soft vs. hard distillation 11:06 On-policy vs. off-policy distillation 18:09 Preparing data for reasoning distillation 22:35 Loading the DeepSeek R1 MATH dataset 28:04 Inspecting reasoning traces and final answers 31:27 Tokenization and chat templates 35:58 Pre-tokenizing the training dataset 39:01 Sequence lengths and the 2,048-token limit 42:38 Creating training and validation splits 45:32 Loading the Qwen3-0.6B base model 46:24 Computing answer-token log probabilities 54:10 Cross-entropy loss for distillation 57:25 Training and validation loss helpers 1:02:03 Implementing the distillation training loop 1:07:26 Running the standalone training script 1:09:41 Plotting training and validation losses 1:11:31 Evaluating checkpoints on MATH-500 1:14:09 Comparing teachers and distillation results 1:16:34 Future directions for reasoning models 1:19:41 Bonus exercises and next steps