Your curated collection of saved posts and media
Really excited about today's @OpenAI Codex release that pushes it from a coding assistant toward a real workspace for the kinds of tasks you do on your computer. The team is firing and we have even more in store. ๐งตHere are my 11 favorite capabilities we announced today
OpenClaw 2026.4.15 ๐ฆ ๐ค Anthropic Opus 4.7 support ๐ฃ๏ธ Gemini TTS in bundled ๐ง Slimmer context + bounded memory reads ๐ง Codex transport self-heal, safer tool/media handling โจ Pile of update/channel fixes Good boring release. https://t.co/jiLmr1Bxep
I have been using Codex a lot thanks to the Codex for OSS program. I never thought I would say this, but I have been more productive than ever just by using Codex.
OMG @OpenAI ILY ๐ซถ๐ป https://t.co/kGqmL0cs3Y
๐งต My tips for getting the best results out of Claude Design! Iโm on the verticals team at Anthropic which means I serve 7 different products. Claude Design makes it possible! 1. Set up your design system and your core screens. An hour of setup and refinement here is worth it
Introducing Claude Design by Anthropic Labs: make prototypes, slides, and one-pagers by talking to Claude. Powered by Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable vision model. Available in research preview on the Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans, rolling out throughout the day. https:
Anthropic's Claude Mythos isn't a sentient super-hacker, it's a sales pitch โ claims of 'thousands' of severe zero-days rely on just 198 manual reviews https://t.co/FMhEyHzlGh
Both Gemini and Grok are underrated. I used to champion Gemini for a while, but lately I've been very happy with Grok, especially since the Grok 4.20 release with multi-agent. And now we have Grok 4.3!
Which one is the most underrated here? https://t.co/zJzBMnfopY
*New Lecture* Stanford @CS153Systems '26, Session 5 (Full Video) Unified Intelligence with Amit Jain (@gravicle) from @LumaLabsAI 01:32 Luma's Origin Story 05:33 Differentiable World Learning 06:36 From 3D Capture To Video 10:40 Dream Machine Flywheel 13:48 Inside The Luma Factory 23:04 Unified Models Explained 32:29 Future Architectures 34:02 Skills and Tools 41:04 Creativity and Exploration 43:03 Sora Shutdown 47:08 GANs Diffusion and Hybrids 51:19 Hollywood Business Model Reset 55:01 What Makes Video Models Useful
grok speech-to-text and tts apis are out. multilingual multi-speaker is huge for me personally. https://t.co/7ABBCUCTO6
๐ๆ้ ๏ผOllama ๅ็ๆฏๆ Hermes Agent ไบ๏ผ ไธ่กๅฝไปคๅฐฑๆๅฎ๏ผ ollama launch hermes ๆฌๅฐ้จ็ฝฒ๏ผ็ฎ็ด็ฝๆญชๆญช๐ ๆฃๆตๆฌๅฐๅฏไปฅ่ทไปไนๆจกๅๅฏไปฅ็จ llmfit ๆ่ ๅจ็บฟๆฃๆต๐ https://t.co/qVYlJomz2Q
ollama launch hermes Ollama 0.21 includes supports Hermes Agent, the self-improving AI agent built by @NousResearch.
๐ฆGoldman Sachs reports that companies are blowing past their AI inference budgets by orders of magnitude, with inference costs in engineering now approaching 10% of total headcount costs and potentially reaching parity with salaries within several quarters. KPMG surveyed 2,100 senior leaders and found US companies plan to spend an average of $178 million on AI over the next 12 months, with Asia-Pacific firms budgeting $245 million and EMEA $157 million. The two reports together show companies are spending more than planned and intend to spend even more. My Take Inference costs approaching headcount parity is an extraordinary number that most finance teams did not model when they approved their AI strategies twelve months ago. The compute crunch, electrical component shortages, and GPU spot prices up 48% in two months are all flowing into corporate operating costs faster than anyone budgeted for, and Goldman's trajectory suggests it accelerates from here. What I find hard to reconcile is that $178 million average sitting alongside enterprise data showing eight in ten workers are either avoiding AI tools or not using them at all. Companies are committing to nine-figure inference budgets while their own employees aren't using what's already been deployed. I've watched this dynamic build all year and my honest read is that a significant portion of this spending is driven by competitive fear rather than demonstrated returns. Nobody wants to be the company that didn't invest in AI when everyone else did. That's how bubbles get funded, and at some point boards are going to demand a number that justifies it. Hedgie๐ค