@llama_index
Can filesystem tools really replace vector search? We put agentic file exploration to the test against traditional RAG. Our experiment with fs-explorer agent vs. hybrid RAG revealed some surprising insights about when each approach shines: π RAG is faster - averaging 3.81 seconds quicker thanks to fewer LLM calls and consistent network requests π― Filesystem agents are more accurate - scoring 2 points higher on correctness by accessing full file context instead of chunked fragments π Scale changes everything - at 100-1000 documents, RAG outperforms filesystem exploration in speed and maintains quality βοΈ Context matters most - filesystem tools excel with smaller files that fit in the LLM's context window, while RAG handles massive document collections The verdict? It depends on your use case. Filesystem agents work great for smaller, focused document sets where accuracy trumps speed. RAG remains king for large-scale applications requiring real-time responses. Read the full experimental analysis by @itsclelia and see the results for yourself: https://t.co/DMG3jnYrKq