@s_batzoglou
I evaluated Ox Alpha on the induction benchmark, accessing the model through OpenRouter. The performance of Ox Alpha on this benchmark is OK but not great. It ranks below Luna and DeepSeek v4 Pro and just above Gemini 3.7 Flash. I have seen other benchmarks posted on X where Ox Alpha rocks, so this could be very benchmark-specific. It was not easy to get evaluable results (at least on OpenRouter). Ox Alpha often returned "" in responses, or API errors. I made 551 API calls to be able to get a reasonable completion rate of 87/100. I wonder if this is an OpenRouter issue or something broader like the model failing to return answers when it hasn't solved the problem. This is very common with reasoning models, but more pronounced than average here. Some words on the induction benchmark: This is a challenging reasoning benchmark, described in ICML 2026. The models are given several small graphs in which some nodes are marked as targets. The task is to provide a first-order logical formula that picks precisely the target nodes in all graphs simultaneously. Correct: a formula that correctly picks precisely the marked nodes. Holdout correct: a formula that correctly picks precisely the marked nodes in held out problems. Formula complexity (in AST): the avg tree size of the correct formula. GitHub public repository: https://t.co/ZXXqzouuni Paper: https://t.co/gBelIZQEaa