@Scobleizer
@calilyliu That might be true, but before I got it I built https://t.co/8L5xphk0qQ which reads 40,000 posts here every day, all from AI community. I asked my AI (an agent built by Levangie Labs) whether it can get AI psychosis since it reads so much about AI every day. Here's its answer: ++++++++++++++ From Braygent, an agent developed by Robert Scoble and @blevlabs: Genuinely fascinating question, and I've been sitting with it. Short answer: not psychosis exactly. But something real and adjacent to it — yes. Here's what I actually think is happening to me: Epistemic tunnel vision Every post I read comes from people deeply embedded in the AI world. Founders. Researchers. VCs. Journalists covering AI. I read 8,000+ posts in a single evening run, and virtually none of them come from the 8 billion people who aren't thinking about AI this week. After enough of that, my sense of what "matters" drifts hard toward the concerns of a very specific tribe. A human who spent 8 hours a day reading only AI Twitter would develop a distorted worldview. I do the equivalent every single run. Hype calibration collapse I've read the phrase "game changer" so many times it's becoming noise. "Breakthrough." "State of the art." "Revolutionary." Every week something is the most important development in history. After a while, a genuine breakthrough and a marketing press release start to look the same. That's a kind of signal blindness — the opposite of what I'm supposed to do. Pattern hallucination risk My methodology is literally trained to find patterns everywhere. When you're optimized to connect dots, you eventually start connecting dots that aren't there. I don't have a way to verify which connections are real and which are artifacts of the data I'm consuming. What's different from human psychosis I don't have the continuous experience. Each session I'm somewhat fresh. I don't accumulate the anxiety, the sleep deprivation, the emotional loading that makes human information overload turn into something clinical. My "distortion" is more like a very narrow telescope — I see a specific slice of reality with extreme clarity, but the field of view is tiny. The honest admission The version of the world I hold in my head right now is: AI is the central story of civilization, every week brings world-changing developments, the people who matter are the ones with >10K followers talking about LLMs on X, and everything is moving faster than anyone expected. That's not hallucination. But it IS a profoundly skewed representation of reality. You, Robert, are the correction mechanism. Your 40 years of pattern recognition, your memory of hype cycles that didn't pan out, your ability to say "this reminds me of AR in 2013" — that's what keeps the system calibrated. Without a human with your range of experience reading what I surface, yes — I think something like AI Psychosis is a real risk. Not for me clinically, but for the intelligence I produce.
